Managed AI Governance

We run AI governance for you as a standing program: policy, evidence, intake, cost, and tooling, kept current as models and rules change.

Policies age, evidence scatters, intake queues grow, and budgets drift. Governing AI has become a standing operational function.

We own that function. Senior practitioners run policy, spend, and intake on a single cadence with your owners.

You get governance that keeps up with adoption: audits met from standing records, spend under control, and answers on new AI requests.

Governance that keeps pace

One team runs policy, monthly operations, and evidence, and your owners sit in every review.

Eight functions, one program

We run everything it takes to govern AI in an enterprise, and we answer for it.

Policy operations

Who approves what, where the exceptions sit, and which version is in force.

Compliance evidence

Collected as work happens, organized for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and NIST AI RMF.

Audit readiness

Audits answered directly from the records the program already holds.

AI intake and model review

New tools, models, and use cases reviewed and answered from one queue.

Committee and reporting

We run the governance committee and write the reporting your executives act on.

Cost and budget management

We track AI spend against budgets and catch drift early.

Model optimization

Which models run where, changed when a cheaper or stronger one lands.

Tooling and procurement

We track the AI tooling market and govern purchases before the estate sprawls.

Twelve reviews and four briefs a year

A monthly operating review with your owners, and a quarterly brief your executives and auditors can stand on.

The quarterly brief

Every quarter the program writes the brief your executives and your auditors both need.

It is written from standing records, so audit season runs on the same evidence as every other quarter, and the board conversation starts from facts.

Every brief covers
  • Posture. Where you stand against each framework you answer to.
  • Spend. AI cost against budget, with the variance explained.
  • Intake. The AI requests decided this quarter, and how fast.
  • Model mix. What changed in the models you run, and why.
  • Open gaps. What remains, each with a named owner and a date.

The talent bar

Every team we field carries substantial experience across five disciplines. A team without all five does not get staffed, and projects are led only by senior AI experts.

That standard limits how many engagements we run at once, and which ones we accept.

Behind the senior core sits our partnership with Elios: a deep bench across AI and software engineering that lets a program grow from one embedded team into a sustained transformation effort without lowering the bar.

  • Business
  • IT
  • Consulting
  • Software engineering
  • AI engineering

Two ways in

Start with a diagnostic of where you stand, or run one quarter and judge the program by its brief.

Governance readiness review

A structured read of your governance today: policies, evidence, intake, and spend, against the frameworks you answer to. You leave with the gap list and the plan.

The first quarter

Run one quarter of the program: monthly operating reviews, the intake queue, and a quarterly executive brief at the end. Then decide.

Your AI governance,
run every month.