Compliance keeps pace with AI use
You do not assemble evidence for an audit; it accrues as your organization works. When a question arrives, from an auditor, a customer, or the board, the answer is a report filtered from records that already exist.
| REPORTS ON DEMAND | Auditor, customer, or board: reports filtered by time, team, model, or policy, from a trail that already exists |
| ALWAYS CURRENT | Evidence accrues with every governed interaction, so a report reflects today, not last quarter's assessment |
| FRAMEWORK COVERAGE | One policy enforced reads as evidence toward the controls it serves, in the language your assessor uses |
| SIEM EXPORT | Records stream in real time to the pipelines your auditors already trust |
Common questions
What does the evidence look like?
A sealed, metadata-only decision receipt for every enforcement decision: the surface, the actor, the detection class, the policy and version that judged it, the action taken, and an integrity hash. Raw prompts and data are not retained as evidence. The deliberate exception is hold for human review, where the held item is visible to your designated reviewers until decided; the trail then keeps the decision, not the content.
Which frameworks does the mapping cover?
SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and the EU AI Act, with reports on demand filtered by time range, department, user, model, or policy. Coverage per framework is laid out in the section below.
How does SIEM export work?
Decision records stream in real time to Splunk, Datadog, and Elastic. Each exported event contains enforcement metadata rather than prompt or response bodies, so your SOC can correlate AI security decisions with the rest of its telemetry.
The frameworks you answer to
Enforcement activity is organized in the control language your assessors use, so one policy enforced reads as evidence toward the controls it serves.
Access, monitoring, and change controls evidenced from the runtime's own decisions.
Personal data protected before it reaches a model, with the decision on record.
PHI detections and the enforcement actions taken, recorded as reviewable evidence.
Cardholder data caught inline; blocks and redactions land on the trail.
AI use logged, governed, and documented as the obligations take effect.
The mapping organizes evidence in your assessor's control language. It informs your assessment rather than replacing it.